A new picture of the Montauk monster was released on Friday. This new picture makes it seem like the 2nd picture takers rolled over the creature. Also, the legs seem to have been unbound by that small leather strap. This picture seems a little shady already because of the missing strap.
There are some things that do make a lot of sense about this picture though. The new picture definitely makes it look like a bloated, decomposed dog. On the underside where it was laying against the sand it's not as dark seeing as how it was out of the sun. It also still has some fur on this side. There are 2 flies more visibly shown on this picture giving proof to its actual size being around that of a dog.
The Gawker and I are still not convinced along with many other people. A new interview with the 3 girls that were the "first" picture takers is also out. They show Plum's Nick Leighton their camera with the picture in it and also the 2nd angle shot which is different than the rolled over pictures (That's 5 pictures now including the new 3). The face looks different in these new pictures as well if you ask me. Nick Leighton also reveals that they've checked with several scientists who all think it's neither a dog nor a raccoon (Still can't believe you said it was a raccoon Jeff...). Anyways you can watch the interview for yourself and see what you think about it (And notice the dumb girls who supposedly took the pictures).
Check out my previous Montauk Monster article here.
Edit: Check out the newest Monty news here.